A Brief Overview
A discussion of short sales cannot be had without addressing the elephant in the room. Between 1997 and 2006, a period of only nine years, on average US house prices rose a staggering 124%.[1] Appendix 1 illustrates historic home values as of 2006 as generated by Robert Shiller, a widely cited visionary who accurately predicted the burst of the housing bubble. While the causes of the real estate bubble were multifaceted and inherently systemic, short sales were and continue to be one of the many ways for corporations and homeowners to deal with its aftermath.
Short sales in real estate borrow their name from the practice of short selling stock. On the stock market a trader can borrow securities with the intention of buying the security back at a later date. The trader who short sells or “shorts” a stock profits from a decline in the price of the stock by buying the stock back in the future at a lower price, in turn making a spread between the prices. Similarly, homeowners borrow against the equity of their home with the intention of buying back the house over a period of time, typically a 30-year mortgage. The comparison ends there – a homeowner can only profit by selling their interest in their house when the value of the house has appreciated.
Appendix 1 is an inflation-adjusted graph. Home values have indeed seen a nominal rise in value; the graphic summarizes that the average home in 1920 sold for $66,000 versus $199,000 in 2006 (a 201.5% increase). Over time real estate prices in the US have always increased. Home ownership is widely recognized as a vehicle for “forced saving;” typically saving-averse consumers who elect to pay a mortgage instead of rent are left with a considerable net worth when they complete their mortgage payments. At the height of the 2007 mortgage boom, loans were being issued oftentimes to sub-prime buyers on the presumption that home prices would always increase. Like in any bubble, when home prices crashed, they crashed hard.[2] While bankruptcy and subsequent foreclosure was a viable option for many, consumers turned to the negotiating table with their lenders for creative solutions.








